Franchising Disputes

Williams + Hughes has acted for both franchisors and franchisees in franchise disputes, including disputes concerning performance of the franchise agreement, non-solicitation and restraint of trade of former franchisees, and claims relating to competition by the franchisor or other franchisees.

Click to view

Relevant examples of our experience include:

  • Acted for a franchisor in Supreme Court proceedings to restrain a franchisee from abandoning the franchise and operating a competing business relating to hose fittings and parts
  • Acted for a franchisor in District Court proceedings to restrain a former franchisee from operating a competing driving school business
  • Acted for a café franchisee in Supreme Court proceedings against a franchisor for allowing competition in the franchise territory
  • Acted for franchisees in Federal Circuit Court proceedings against the franchisor for misleading and deceptive conduct in the sale of franchises
  • Advised a real estate agency franchise as to the terms of their franchise agreement
Click to view
Covid-19 relief for commercial tenants in Western Australia

The State and Commonwealth Governments are in the process of enacting legislation to provide relief ...

Disclose the full upfront price or risk breaking the law: new upfront pricing laws apply

It is not uncommon for businesses to advertise a headline price for goods and services to their...

Franchising: Federal Court freezes assets of franchisor to protect franchisees who claim they were misled

Background Jump Swim is an Australian-based franchisor that sells franchises to franchisees wishi...

Copyright © 2020 Williams+ Hughes. All Rights Reserved | Privacy | Terms & Conditions